Saturday, February 28, 2009

It's MARCH?!?!

Rabbit rabbit...

I'd be more enthusiastic, but I'm not sure how it's March already (Yes, it's March already, it's now midnight on March 1, 2009 here in England). Time has been flying by. Cassidy will be here in less than a week (!!!), and then I'll be home in late May.

Right now, I'm still working on that Holocaust paper...midnight on a Saturday workin' on an essay - it doesn't get any better than this!

Well, Happy March, everybody!

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Word of the Year

Yesterday, I read an article about Obama's speech on the night of February 24 (link to the article by Jeff Zeleny). The article discussed the highlights of Obama's speech - some of his plans for the next four years: the $787 billion stimulus package, the bail out of US banks, a decrease in dependence on foreign oil and the reform of health care (among others). Zeleny does note, however, that Obama was rather vague in his speech. He said what he desires to do, but not how he intends to do it. As has been my tendency so far with our new President, I began to worry.

I began to worry that because of his vagueness, Obama will be criticized. I wondered how much I myself could trust someone who doesn't share how they plan on turning the country around with millions of viewers watching around the world.

And then I remembered...again...patience.
  1. Obama has been in office for barely over a month;
  2. A little under an hour (the length of Obama's speech) is nowhere near enough time to outline just how Obama plans to essentially undo all the Bush administration has done in eight long years;
  3. The day after Zeleny's article was published, today, there is an article by Jackie Calmes describing how Obama plans to lower tax cuts for the wealthy and to use the money gained to make health care more affordable in the future.
Of course, Calmes talks a lot about tax brackets and just how the new tax cuts will work, but no matter how long I stared at the words on my screen I couldn't quite make head nor tails of exactly what it all meant.

The bottom line is this: of course Obama has plans for what he intends to do during his term. Of course there will be opposition from people throughout the United States. And he's been in office for one month. One month isn't even enough time to grow a decent-looking beard (although...how would I know?), much less know how to pull one of the most powerful countries in the world out of an economic recession and change a great deal of what has been put in place in the last eight years.

I simply need to have confidence in Mr. Obama and have faith in the fact that he can lead us out of these dark(ish) times. I've no reason to doubt him.

Some quotes I liked from the speech:
"While our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken, though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this: we will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before."

"While the cost of action will be great, I assure you the cost of inaction will be far greater."

He also said (and I'm paraphrasing) that we need to sacrifice short term benefits and comforts for the long term ones.

I'm going to make "Patience" my personal word of the year.

-ZMG

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Brief Academic Update

As we are already past the halfway point in the semester (our 7th week out of 12) I have begun working on my coursework for this semester (essays). On Monday, March 2, I have an essay due for my Holocaust class. I'm attempting to answer the question, "Did Germans kill Jews because they wanted to?" I also have an essay due on Thursday, March 6 for my Poetry in Dark Times class. I've yet to decide what I'm writing about for that paper.

For my Holocaust paper, I have three books to consult (so far): The Origins of the Final Solution, The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy 1939-1942, by Christopher R. Browning (Arrow, 2004), Hitler's Willing Executioners, Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust by Daniel J. Goldhagen (Vintage, 1997) and Hitler, the Germans, and the Final Solution by Ian Kershaw (Yale University Press, 2008). 

It has been fascinating, overwhelming and heartbreaking reading about the holocaust, and I will elaborate on why and what I've learned thus far when I have some more time. For now, though, I'm off to continue doing research and to continue outlining my essay. 

-ZMG

Monday, February 23, 2009

Spotify

My flatmate Tom recently told me about a computer application called Spotify. Download it, listen to all different kinds of music legally and for free. It's incredible. You can choose genres of music and time periods - for example, Jazz from only the '40s and the '50s, or Hip-Hop from only the 21st century. The possibilities are endless. I highly suggest downloading it and using it. It's a great way to discover new music. www.spotify.com

I think it was developed in the UK, so I'm not entirely positive that it will work in the US. I hope it does. Good luck!

-ZMG

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Last night, Emma and I went to see The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. The movie was remarkable, but what I wanted to share was this: on the way there, I saw an older gentleman stop to give a homeless man his jacket. It was one of the more compassionate, caring acts I think I've ever seen, particularly from one stranger to another. 

-ZMG

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Success!


A successful attempt at oatmeal this morning! No burnt oats, no lumps, no soapy dishwater - just oatmeal and milk. I ate while listening to a podcast of the New Yorker fiction section, a reading of John Updike's story, "Playing with Dynamite". A pretty good Saturday morning...uh...afternoon.

-ZMG

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Zack's Oatmeal Adventures

In a bold move this morning, I attempted to make myself oatmeal for breakfast. Unsure of proportions, I eyeballed the amount of oatmeal and water. There wasn't enough water. I burnt (only slightly) some of the oatmeal. I spooned it into a bowl and decided it would be a good idea to add some milk to make it less clumpy. In the process, I spilled some milk on the counter. I grabbed a sponge out of the sink - that was completely waterlogged (shocking, right?) - and in the process of transporting the sponge to the spill...over my bowl of oatmeal...I accidentally squeezed some delicious, partially soapy sink-water into my breakfast. "Oh, good, that'll be delicious," I said...out loud...to myself. Sometimes I think doing something really stupid is better when there's someone around to laugh at you, because otherwise - especially when it ruins your breakfast - it's hard to laugh at yourself when someone else isn't laughing at you. I cleaned up the spill, put some more milk in the oatmeal, and then dumped enough sugar in to make an eight-year-old bounce off the walls for four days. It was still too clumpy, and now only warm because I had put so much milk in it. I ate it anyway, clumps, soapy sink-water and all...

Ah, well, tomorrow is another day, another breakfast...

-ZMG

Friday, February 06, 2009

My Purchase of the Month

I ventured into Norwich today to find some reading material that I'd been craving (despite the fact that I have a ton to read already and told myself at the beginning of the semester that I was not allowed to buy any more books until I read the ones I already have...oh well), and found what I was looking for at Borders. I came across this ENORMOUS volume of short stories by John Updike, compiled by the author himself. I also found a copy of his novel, Rabbit, Run (Penguin) which was part of a 3-for-2 deal at Borders, so, naturally I had to find two other books bearing the same sticker so that my money would not go to waste. I decided on a collection of stories by Raymond Carver entitled, will you please be quiet, please? (Vintage) and The Collected Dorothy Parker (Penguin) by, of course Dorothy Parker. As I've ventured cautiously away from writing that first novel that will win me international glory and fame and have tiptoed towards writing more short stories to see if I can actually finish some of my writing, I've been reading more short stories than I ever have in my life. I've even considered the possibility that I never tend to finish writing stories because, until recently, I never really finished reading stories. I'll let you know how this experiment goes. 

I've read three of the Updike stories so far, and, to my merriment, I'm hooked. 

-ZMG

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Yet another good New York Times Article

I like to pretend I'm at home with a copy of the Sunday New York Times on Sundays here in England by reading a few articles on the Times website. Today I came across this one, about a program at the 92nd St. Y through which New York City public high school students get to sit down to dinner and discussions with various contemporary authors. First of all, I began wishing I was a New York City public high school student. What a fantastic opportunity! And what a fantastic idea on the part of the Y. It's wonderful that the writers donate (I'm not positive they actually donate, perhaps they get paid for this...) their time to, as the article states, showing young aspiring writers that not all authors are dead. 

I wanted to bring attention to one quote from one of the students, however. One student said she was looking forward to reading some of Junot Díaz's stories because like Mr. Díaz, she is from the Dominican Republic and has spent time there and has, "felt what he felt", and, "seen what he saw." She says that, "With other authors, you're not always a participant, you can't always relate." 

I've always wondered just how important it is to be able to relate to authors and their experiences. If an appreciation for literature had its roots in a reader's ability to relate to the author, the author's experiences and the subject matter within the book or poem or essay or whatever it may be, I feel there would only be a small percentage of literature that an individual could appreciate, or "participate" in. This is, in no way, an assault on the young lady that made that point in the article, because I have heard people say the same thing to some effect before. In fact, I've probably said it several times myself. But when I think about it, I don't think a reader should have to be able to relate to an author. If this were the case, would anyone like the Harry Potter series? If this were the case, I don't think I could have enjoyed The Human Stain, American Pastoral, even The Great Gatsby. I can't relate to those stories at all. I believe whether or not a reader can relate to a story depends on the author's ability to allow the reader to relate. The writing should be accessible enough, vivid enough that anyone can appreciate it, no matter who the author may be. Thoughts?

-ZMG